4.6 Article

Distribution and dynamic changes of sphingolipids in blood in response to platelet activation

期刊

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
卷 4, 期 12, 页码 2704-2709

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.02241.x

关键词

blood platelets; ceramides; electrospray ionization mass spectrometry; sphingolipids; sphingosine-1-phosphate

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P01 CA097132-01A1] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Sphingolipids are signaling molecules in a range of biological processes. While sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is thought to be abundantly stored in platelets and released upon stimulation, knowledge about the distribution and function of other sphingolipids in blood is lacking. Objectives: To analyze the sphingolipid content of blood components with special emphasis on dynamic changes in platelets. Methods: Blood components from mice and humans were prepared by gradient centrifugation and analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Additionally, murine platelets were activated in vitro and in vivo. Results: Isolated non-activated platelets of mice were devoid of S1P, but instead contained dihydrosphingosine-1-phosphate (dhS1P), along with a high concentration of ceramide. Activation of platelets in vitro led to a loss of dhS1P and an increase in sphingosine, accompanied by a reduction of ceramide content. Platelet activation in vivo led to an immediate and continuous rise of dhS1P in plasma, while S1P remained stable. The sphingolipid distribution of human blood was markedly different from mice. Human platelets contained dhS1P in addition to S1P. Conclusions: Mouse platelets contain dhS1P instead of S1P. Platelet activation causes loss of dhS1P and breakdown of ceramide, implying ceramidase activation. Release of dhS1P from activated platelets might be a novel signaling pathway. Finally, the sphingolipid composition of mouse and human blood shows large differences, which must be considered when studying sphingolipid biology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据