4.3 Article

Solubilization and release properties of dendrimers. Evaluation as prospective drug delivery systems

期刊

SUPRAMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY
卷 18, 期 8, 页码 633-643

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10610270601012776

关键词

dendrimers; polymers; encapsulation; antichagasic activity; solubility; host-guest interactions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The polarity and accessibility to the interior of several dendrimers using phenanthrene, anthracene and tetrabenzonaphtalene as probe molecules have been investigated. In addition the prospective application of the dendrimers as drug carriers was evaluated by incorporating 5(6)-methylbenzo[1,2-c] 1,2,5-oxadiazole N-1-oxide] (1) and 2'-(benzo[1,2-c] 1,2,5-oxadiazol-5(6)-yl(N-1-oxide) methylidene]-1-methoxy methane hydrazide (2). These compounds have antichagasic therapeutic activity but very low water solubility, which limits their application. Polypropylene imine dendrimers with amine terminal groups (DAB-16AT and DAB-32AT) and polyamide amine (PAMAM) dendrimers with carboxylate terminal groups (PAMAM-32CT), with amine terminal groups, (PAMAM-8AT and PAMAM-32AT) and with hydroxyl terminal groups (PAMAM-32OHT) were chosen for this study. Approximately one molecule of phenanthrene or anthracene was encapsulated in PAMAM-32CT, PAMAM-32A1T, PAMAM-32OHT and DAB-32AT dendrimers. However, slight encapsulation was observed working with PAMAM-8AT and DAB-16AT. The studies with tetrabenzonaphtalene show that the guest molecule might only be partially caged within the dendrimer host. However, for relatively insoluble solutes the efficiency to encapsulate can be dictated by the saturation in the aqueous phase besides the dendrimer capacity to dissolve it. These dendrimers are also able to encapsulate and consequently solubilize 1 and 2 oxadiazol. However, PAMAM dendrimers are better for encapsulation and retention due to guest-host specific interactions. These interactions can be diminished by lowering the pH to allow a controlled deliverance of the drug.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据