4.6 Article

Flow-activated chloride channels in vascular endothelium - Shear stress sensitivity, desensitization dynamics, and physiological implications

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 281, 期 48, 页码 36492-36500

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M605866200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although activation of outward rectifying Cl- channels is one of the fastest responses of endothelial cells (ECs) to shear stress, little is known about these channels. In this study, we used whole-cell patch clamp recordings to characterize the flow-activated Cl- current in bovine aortic ECs (BAECs). Application of shear stress induced rapid development of a Cl- current that was effectively blocked by the Cl- channel antagonist 5-nitro-2(3-phenopropylamino) benzoic acid (100 mu M). The current initiated at a shear stress as low as 0.3 dyne/cm(2), attained its peak within minutes of flow onset, and saturated above 3.5 dynes/cm(2) (similar to 2.5-3.5-fold increase over pre-flow levels). The Cl- current desensitized slowly in response to sustained flow, and step increases in shear stress elicited increased current only if the shear stress levels were below the 3.5 dynes/cm(2) saturation level. Oscillatory flow with a physiological oscillation frequency of 1 Hz, as occurs in disturbed flow zones prone to atherosclerosis, failed to elicit the Cl- current, whereas lower oscillation frequencies led to partial recovery of the current. Nonreversing pulsatile flow, generally considered protective of atherosclerosis, was as effective in eliciting the current as steady flow. Measurements using fluids of different viscosities indicated that the Cl- current is responsive to shear stress rather than shear rate. Blocking the flow-activated Cl- current abolished flow-induced Akt phosphorylation in BAECs, whereas blocking flow-sensitive K+ currents had no effect, suggesting that flow-activated Cl+ channels play an important role in regulating EC flow signaling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据