4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

The relationship between access and quality of urban green space with population physical activity

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 120, 期 12, 页码 1127-1132

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2006.10.007

关键词

physical activity; neighbourhood; environment; green space; GIS

资金

  1. MRC [MC_U106179474] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_U106179474] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_U106179474] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: This study examined the association between access to quality urban green space and levels of physical activity. Study design: A cross-sectional examination of the relationship between access to quality urban green space and level of recreational physical activity in 4950 middle-aged (40-70 years) respondents from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC), who resided in Norwich, UK. Methods: Using geographic information systems (GIS), three measures of access to open green space were calculated based on distance only, distance and size of green space and distance, size and quality of green space. Multiple regression models were used to determine the relationship between the three indicators of access to open green space and level of recreational physical activity. Results: There was no evidence of clear relationships between recreational activity and access to green spaces. Non-significant associations were apparent for all variables, and there was no evidence of a clear trend in regression coefficients across quartiles of access for either the distance, size adjusted, and quality and size-adjusted models. Furthermore, the neighbourhood measures of access to green spaces showed non-significant associations with recreational physical activity. Conclusions: Access to urban green spaces does not appear to be associated with population Levels of recreational physical activity in our sample of middle-aged adults. (c) 2006 The Royal Institute of Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据