4.2 Article

Development of active-safety surveillance system for traditional Chinese medicine: an empirical study in treating climacteric women

期刊

PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY
卷 15, 期 12, 页码 889-899

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/pds.1340

关键词

active safety surveillance; adverse event; climacteric syndrome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Traditional Chinese medicines (TCM) prescribed by doctors are regularly reimbursed by the National Health Insurance (NHI) in Taiwan. The safety of TCM should undergo the same scrutiny that most western medicines do. This study was to monitor adverse events (AEs) associated with a new mixture of TCM, TMN-1, used to treat climacteric symptoms. Methods For this multi-center, prospective observational study, we recruited 134 women with climacteric symptoms. During this 12-week study, the subjects made nine visits, took TMN-1 three times a day, and received routine hematologic tests, biochemical tests, and tests for gynecologically relevant hormones at baseline and after 4 and 12 weeks of beginning medication. At every visit, the subjects were asked by questionnaire about any AEs. All AEs were examined through a process of causality assessment (CA) by a research team. Results In total, we recorded 203 AEs, in order of decreasing incidences-cough, pharyngitis, rhinitis, abdominal pain, abdominal fullness, diarrhea, and pruritus with incidence rates of 2.57, 2.47, 1.88, 1.78, 1.68, 1.58, and 1.58 per 10(3) person-days, respectively. Most AEs were tolerable. Five of the AEs were judged to be probable adverse drug reactions (ADRs): Two events of diarrhea and one event each of nausea, abdominal pain, and abdominal fullness. Conclusion This study demonstrates the effectiveness using active safety surveillance to document safety of TCMs. This surveillance system could probably be useful to document the safety of other alternative or complementary medicines. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据