4.0 Article

Polyomavirus (BK) in pediatric renal transplants: Evaluation of viremic patients with and without BK associated nephritis

期刊

PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION
卷 10, 期 8, 页码 920-922

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2006.00575.x

关键词

polyoma (BK) virus; renal transplant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polyoma BK virus (BKV) is emerging as a significant complication in renal transplantation, which may lead to renal dysfunction and graft loss caused by BK nephritis (BKN). We report the management and outcome of 20 children who developed BK viremia. Serum polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for BKV DNA was measured monthly for the first year in transplant recipients and every six months thereafter, or for unexplained creatinine elevation. With seroconversion to +PCR, patients were managed with reduction of immunosuppression. Renal biopsy was performed if PCR or creatinine did not improve. From June 2003 to January 2006, 20 children seroconverted for BKV at 23 to 1410 days post-transplant (mean 467 days). Sixteen underwent renal biopsy. Eight displayed BKN, three acute rejection and five were normal. Patients with BKN displayed higher PCR and serum creatinine and presented later than children with viremia without BKN. There were no differences between the two groups for age, gender, donor source or immunosuppression. Seven children with BKN received treatment with cidofovir. Thirteen patients (65%) remained PCR+ after reduction of immunosuppression or treatment with cidofovir. Renal function was stable in 16 children (80%) at 13 +/- 6 months after seroconversion. Four patients with BKN demonstrated progressive loss of renal function. BKV infection in children can occur as an early complication or may develop years after transplantation. Patients with BKN presented later and displayed higher viral loads and serum creatinine than viremic patients without BKN. Children with BKN remained PCR+ despite reduction of immunosuppression or treatment with cidofovir and were at greater risk for loss of renal function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据