4.5 Article

Myogenic vasoconstriction in mouse renal interlobar arteries:: role of endogenous β and γENaC

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-RENAL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 291, 期 6, 页码 F1184-F1191

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.00177.2006

关键词

mechanotransduction; transfected isolated renal vessel; stretch-activated cation channel; siRNA; dominant negative

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-51971, HL-071603, HL-082425] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mechanosensitive ion channels are thought to initiate pressure-induced vasoconstriction, however, the molecular identity of these channels is unknown. Recent work from our laboratory suggests that members of the Degenerin/Epithelial Na+ Channel (DEG/ENaC) family may be components of the mechanosensitive ion channel complex in vascular smooth muscle (VSM); however, the specific DEG/ENaC proteins mediating myogenic constriction are unknown. The goal of this study is to determine if specific knockdown of beta or gamma ENaC, using dominant-negative (DN) or small-interference RNA (siRNA) molecules, inhibits pressure-induced vasoconstriction in mouse renal interlobar arteries. To address this goal, isolated arteries were transiently transfected with beta or gamma ENaC DN-cDNA or siRNA molecules. After 24 h, vessels were either 1) cannulated and pressurized for pressure-diameter response curves or 2) dissociated and immunolabeled to determine VSM cell endogenous ENaC protein expression. We found that transfection of beta ENaC DN-cDNA or siRNA suppresses beta-, but not gamma ENaC protein expression. Similarly, gamma ENaC DN-cDNA or siRNA suppresses gamma-, but not beta ENaC protein expression. In addition, transfection of beta- or gamma ENaC DN-cDNA or siRNA molecules inhibits pressure-induced vasoconstriction, but does not block agonist-induced vasoconstriction. Our results provide the first direct evidence that beta and gamma ENaC proteins are essential in mediating myogenic vasoconstriction in mouse renal interlobar arteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据