4.4 Article

Comparative metabolism and disposition of trichloroethylene in Cyp2e1-/- and wild-type mice

期刊

DRUG METABOLISM AND DISPOSITION
卷 34, 期 12, 页码 2020-2027

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/dmd.106.010538

关键词

-

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Trichloroethylene (TCE) 1 is an important environmental contaminant, a well established rodent carcinogen, and a probable human carcinogen. Metabolism of TCE occurs primarily via cytochrome P450 (P450)-dependent oxidation. In vitro studies suggested that CYP2E1 is the principal high-affinity enzyme responsible for TCE metabolism. The objective of the present work is to more directly assess the role of CYP2E1 in the metabolism and disposition of 1,2-C-14-TCE administered at 250 or 1000 mg/kg (gavage) using Cyp2e1-/- [knockout(KO)] versus wild-type (WT) mice. After dosing, animals were individually placed in glass metabolism cages that allowed the collection of expired air, urine, and feces. Exhalation of TCE-derived (CO2)-C-14 increased in a dose-dependent manner in mice of both genotypes and was significantly higher in WT versus KO mice. A significantly greater percentage of the dose was exhaled in KO versus WT mice as organic volatiles (mainly as TCE). Urinary excretion was the major route of TCE metabolism in WT mice, and the percentage of dose eliminated in urine was significantly higher at the 250 versus 1000 mg/kg dose. Furthermore, urinary excretion and CO2 exhalation significantly decreased in KO versus WT mice. Pretreatment with 1-aminobenzotriazole clearly inhibited TCE metabolism as evident from increased exhalation of parent TCE, and decreased urinary excretion and CO2 exhalation in mice of both genotypes. In conclusion, these data showed that whereas CYP2E1 plays an important role in TCE metabolism and disposition, other P450s also play a significant role and may explain earlier results showing that TCE causes lung damage in KO and WT mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据