4.6 Article

Glucocorticoid-induced tumour necrosis factor receptor family-related receptor signalling exacerbates hapten-induced colitis by CD4+ T cells

期刊

IMMUNOLOGY
卷 119, 期 4, 页码 479-487

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2006.02459.x

关键词

co-stimulation; co-stimulatory molecules; Crohn's disease; helper T cells; inflammatory bowel disease; T cells

资金

  1. NEI NIH HHS [R01 EY013325, R01EY013325] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The glucocorticoid-induced tumour necrosis factor receptor family related gene (GITR) has been reported to be expressed on the activated T and CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells (Treg). Signalling triggered by GITR not only neutralizes the suppressive effect of Treg cells, but also augments activation, proliferation and cytokine production of effector T cells. To test the role of GITR in 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulphonic acid (TNBS)-induced colitis - a murine model of mucosal inflammation - TNBS-injected Balb/c mice were treated with agonistic anti-GITR monoclonal antibody (mAb). Anti-GITR treatment increased the death rate compared to rat IgG-treated mice. Typically, death occurred within 4 days after the TNBS injection when the mice were treated with anti-GITR. The mice that survived anti-GITR treatment suffered from severe inflammation in their entire intestines. CD4(+) T-depletion protected the mice from colitis; even an anti-GITR effect was not apparent. In contrast, CD8(+) T depletion showed less protective than did CD4(+) T depletion. Stimulation of GITR enhanced the production of proinflammatory cytokines including interferon (IFN)-gamma, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-12. It also enhanced the humoral response such as serum levels of IgG(2b) and IgA, which was completely dependent on CD4(+) T cells. Taken together, this study demonstrated that GITR signalling on CD4(+) T cells is involved in the development and progress of colitis by enhancing both T helper type 1 (Th1) and Th2 type responses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据