4.6 Article

Prognostic significance of common preoperative laboratory variables in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

期刊

BJU INTERNATIONAL
卷 98, 期 6, 页码 1228-1232

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06437.x

关键词

kidney; RCC; clear cell; prognosis; laboratory variables

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE To investigate the prognostic significance of common preoperative laboratory variables evaluated before surgery for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively analysed the records of 355 patients who had surgery for clear cell RCC, assessing: clinical factors, including preoperative laboratory measurements, i.e. haemoglobin level, leukocyte count, platelet count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), serum calcium, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), albumin, bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and red blood cells in urine; and pathological factors, with the survival rates after surgery. RESULTS The presence of metastasis, tumour stage and tumour size, with the ESR and ALP before surgery, were identified as significant prognostic factors for progression-free survival in a multivariate analysis. The same factors were significant independent factors for disease-specific survival, except for ESR and ALP, which were nearly statistically significant. When limited to non-metastatic tumours only, the multivariate analysis showed that ESR and ALP, with tumour stage, grade, size and necrosis, were independent prognostic factors for disease-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS Along with traditionally accepted prognostic factors, these results suggest that common laboratory variables assessed before surgery, e.g. ESR and ALP, might also be useful in assessing the prognosis for patients with non-metastatic clear cell RCC. Including various laboratory variables in prognostic algorithms for RCC should be considered after further validation in RCCs of various histological subtypes and stages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据