4.4 Article

Mapping quantitative trait loci for heading date and awn length using an advanced backcross line from a cross between Oryza sativa and O-minuta

期刊

BREEDING SCIENCE
卷 56, 期 4, 页码 341-349

出版社

JAPANESE SOC BREEDING
DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.56.341

关键词

Oryza sativa; Oryza minuta; introgression; quantitative trait locus; days to heading; awn

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An advanced backcross line, WH29001, was produced from a single plant from BC5F3 families derived from a cross between Oryza minuta (2n=48, BBCC, Ace. No. 101141) as a donor parent and the O. saliva subsp. japonica cv. Hwaseongbyeo as a recurrent parent. Although WH29001 resembled Hwaseongbyeo, several traits were different from those of Hwaseongbyeo, including awn length and heading date. These differences between Hwaseongbyeo and WH29001 could be attributed to the introgressed O. minuta chromosome segments into WH29001. SSR analysis enabled to identify thirteen O. minuta-specific chromosome segments in WH29001 genome. To map and characterize QTLs for awn length and heading date, an F-2.3 population from the Hwaseongbyeo/WH29001 cross was developed. The 197 F-2 plants and 197 F-3 families were evaluated for the two traits and the genotypes of the 197 F-2 plants were determined using eighteen SSR markers located in the introgressed segments from O. minuta. QTL analysis identified two QTLs each for days to heading and awn length on chromosomes 6 and 9, respectively. The total phenotypic variance explained by these four QTLs ranged from 8.1% to 51.0% in the F-3 population. Interestingly, QTLs for heading date and awn length were colocalized on chromosomes 6 and 9, respectively. Among these QTLs identified, the QTLs for heading date (dth9) and awn length (awn6) had not been detected in previous QTL studies between Oryza cultivars, indicating the existence of potentially novel alleles from O. minuta. The QTLs detected in the present study could become a valuable source of natural genetic variation underlying the evolution of rice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据