4.4 Article

Identification of basolateral amygdala projection cells and interneurons using extracellular recordings

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 96, 期 6, 页码 3257-3265

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00577.2006

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [1F31 MH 076415-01, R01 MH 073610-01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study tested whether firing rate and spike shape could be used to distinguish projection cells from interneurons in extracellular recordings of basolateral amygdala (BLA) neurons. To this end, we recorded BLA neurons in isoflurane-anesthetized animals with tungsten microelectrodes. Projection cells were identified by antidromic activation from cortical projection sites of the BLA. Although most projection cells fired spontaneously at low rates (< 1 Hz), an important subset fired at higher rates (up to 6.8 Hz). In fact, the distribution of firing rates in projection cells and unidentified BLA neurons overlapped extensively, even though the latter cell group presumably contains a higher proportion of interneurons. The only difference between the two distributions was a small subset (5.1%) of unidentified neurons with unusually high firing rates (9-16 Hz). Similarly, distributions of spike durations in both cell groups were indistinguishable, although most of the fast-firing neurons had spike durations at the low end of the distribution. However, we observed that spike durations depended on the exact position of the electrode with respect to the recorded cell, varying by as much as 0.7 ms. Thus neither firing rate nor spike waveform allowed for unequivocal separation of projection cells from interneurons. Nevertheless, we propose the use of two firing rate cutoffs to obtain relatively pure samples of projection cells and interneurons: <= 1 Hz for projection cells and >= 7 Hz for fast- spiking interneurons. Supplemented with spike-duration cutoffs of >= 0.7 ms for projection cells and <= 0.5 ms for interneurons, this approach should keep instances of misclassifications to a minimum.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据