4.6 Article

Immune-biosensor for aflatoxin B1 based bio-electrocatalytic reaction on micro-comb electrode

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 32, 期 3, 页码 211-217

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2006.10.003

关键词

conductometric immune-biosensor; bio-electrocatalytic signal; gold nanoparticles; aflatoxin B-1

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new immunoassay concept for the determination of aflatoxin B-1 (AFB(1)) based bio-electrocatalytic reaction on micro-comb electrode was proposed. The micro-comb electrode was fabricated by means of self-assembling horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and AFB(1) antibody molecules onto gold nanoparticles (nanogold) functionalized biorecognition surfaces. The presence of nanogold provided a congenial microenvironment for the immobilized biomolecules and decreased the electron transfer impedance, leading to a direct electrochemical behavior of the immobilized HRP. The formation of the antibody-antigen complex by a simple one-step immumoreaction between the immobilized anti-AFB(1) and AFB(1) in sample solution introduced a barrier of direct electrical communication between the immobilized HRP and the electrode surface, thus local conductivity variations could be detected by the HRP bio-electrocatalytic reaction in 0.02 M phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.0) containing 80 mu M H2O2 0.05 M KI and 0.15 M NaCl. Under optimal conditions, the proposed immune-biosensor exhibited a good conductometric response relative to AFB(1) concentration in a linear range from 0.5 to 10 ng/ml with a relatively low detection limit of 0.1 ng/ml at 35. The developed immune-biosensor showed an acceptable accuracy compared with those obtained from ELISA. The inter-assay coefficients of variation are 7.1 and 4.6% at 1.0 and 8.0 ng/ml AFB(1), respectively. The storage stability is acceptable in a pH 7.0 phosphate buffer solution at 4 degrees C for 12 days. Importantly, the proposed methodology could be extended to the detection of other antigens or biosecurities. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据