4.6 Article

IFN regulatory factor 4 and 8 promote Ig light chain κ locus activation in pre-B cell development

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 177, 期 11, 页码 7898-7904

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.11.7898

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI 67891] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous studies have shown that B cell development is blocked at the pre-B cell stage in IFN regulatory factor (IRF)4 (pip) and IRF8 (IFN consensus sequence binding protein) double mutant mice (IRF4,8(-/-)). In this study, the molecular mechanism by which IRF4,8 regulate pre-B cell development was further investigated. We show that IRF4,8 function in a B cell intrinsic manner to control pre-B cell development. IRF4,8(-/-) mice expressing a Bcl-2 transgene fail to rescue pre-B cell development, suggesting that the defect in B cell development in IRF4,8(-/-) mice is not due to a lack of survival signal. IRF4,8(-/-) pre-B cells display a high proliferation index that may indirectly inhibit the L chain rearrangement. However, forced cell cycle exit induced by IL-7 withdrawal fails to rescue the development of IRF4,8(-/-) pre-B cells, suggesting that cell cycle exit by itself is not sufficient to rescue the development of IRF4,8(-/-) pre-B cells and that IRF4,8 may directly regulate the activation of L chain loci. Using retroviral mediated gene transduction, we show that IRF4 and IRF8 function redundantly to promote pre-B cell maturation and the generation of IgM(+) B cells. Molecular analysis indicates that IRF4, when expressed in IRF4,8(-/-) pre-B cells, induces kappa germline transcription, enhances V(D)J rearrangement activity at the kappa locus, and promotes L chain rearrangement and transcription. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay further reveals that IRF4 expression leads to histone modifications and enhanced chromatin accessibility at the kappa locus. Thus, IRF4,8 control pre-B cell development, at least in part, by promoting the activation of the kappa locus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据