4.2 Article

Role of salvage cytoreductive surgery in the treatment of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer after platinum-based chemotherapy

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2006.00460.x

关键词

chemotherapy; cytoreductive surgery; prognostic factor; recurrent ovarian cancer; survival

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The role of cytoreductive surgery, which is well established in the primary treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer, is controversial in recurrent disease. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical benefit of salvage surgical cytoreduction in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer after platinum-based chemotherapy. Methosd: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 46 patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer treated at our department between 1988 and 2003. Twenty-three patients underwent salvage cytoreductive surgery (cytoreductive group), and the other 23 patients were treated without surgery (control group). Results: Patients in cytoreductive group had a median survival of 41.7 months after recurrence, which was significantly longer than control group (18.8 months; P < 0.01). The duration of stay at home and the period oral intake was preserved were significantly longer in the cytoreductive group. In the cytoreductive group, survival was influenced by the residual disease after surgery (residual tumor diameter, < 2 cm vs > 2 cm; median survival, 50 months vs 35.2 months; P < 0.05). However, the number of recurrent sites (solitary vs multiple) and the lengths of treatment-free intervals after primary treatment (< 6 months vs > 6 months) showed no significant influence on survival. Conclusions: The application of cytoreductive surgery might improve the prognosis of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer if the tumor was resectable. Preserved prognoses of platinum-resistant disease with short treatment-free interval demonstrated in this study suggest that the concept of maximum cytoreduction might be introduced in the treatment of recurrent disease in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据