4.6 Article

Inhibition of human IAPP fibril formation does not prevent β-cell death:: evidence for distinct actions of oligomers and fibrils of human IAPP

期刊

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00082.2006

关键词

islet amyloid polypeptide; human islet amyloid polypeptide; rifampicin

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK-59579] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS-31230] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is characterized by an similar to 60% deficit in beta-cell mass, increased beta-cell apoptosis, and islet amyloid derived from islet amyloid polypeptide ( IAPP). Human IAPP (hIAPP) forms oligomers, leading to either amyloid fibrils or toxic oligomers in an aqueous solution in vitro. Either application of hIAPP on or overexpression of hIAPP in cells induces apoptosis. It remains controversial whether the fibrils or smaller toxic oligomers induce beta-cell apoptosis. Rifampicin prevents hIAPP amyloid fibril formation and has been proposed as a potential target for prevention of T2DM. We examined the actions of rifampicin on hIAPP amyloid fibril and toxic oligomer formation as well as its ability to protect beta-cells from either application of hIAPP or endogenous overexpression of hIAPP (transgenic rats and adenovirus-transduced beta-cells). We report that rifampicin (Acocella G. Clin Pharmacokinet 3: 108-127, 1978) prevents hIAPP fibril formation, but not formation of toxic hIAPP oligomers ( Bates G. Lancet 361: 1642 1644, 2003), and does not protect beta-cells from apoptosis induced by either overexpression or application of hIAPP. These data emphasize that toxic hIAPP oligomers, rather than hIAPP fibrils, initiate beta-cell apoptosis and that screening tools to identify inhibitors of amyloid fibril formation are likely to be less useful than those that identify inhibitors of toxic oligomer formation. Finally, rifampicin and related molecules do not appear to be useful as candidates for prevention of T2DM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据