4.7 Article

Monoamine oxidase A activity and norepinephrine level in hippocampus determine hyperwheel running in SPORTS rats

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 31, 期 12, 页码 2627-2638

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301028

关键词

exercise behavior; hyper-running; monoamine oxidase A; norepinephrine; hippocampus; alpha(2)-adrenergic receptor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An understanding of neurological mechanisms for wheel running by rodents, especially with high exercise activity, would be applicable to a strategy for promotion of exercise motivation in humans. One of several brain regions that are candidates for the regulation of physical exercise is the hippocampus. Here we examined the running activity of Spontaneously-Running-Tokushima-Shikoku (SPORTS) rat, a new animal model for high levels of wheel-running activity, and its relation with the hippocampal norepinephrine (NE) system including the levels of NE, adrenergic receptors, and degradation enzymes for monoamines. In the hippocampus of SPORTS rats, the level of NE in extracellular fluid was augmented, whereas the level in the homogenate of the whole tissue was decreased even for sedentary conditions. Elevated extracellular NE caused downregulation of alpha 2-adrenergic receptors in the hippocampus of SPORTS rats. Local administration of alpha 2-adrenergic receptor antagonist yohimbine, but not of alpha 2-agonist clonidine, into the hippocampus suppressed high running activity in SPORTS rats. The protein expression and the activity levels of monoamine oxidase A (MAOA), a critical enzyme for the degradation of NE, were decreased in the hippocampus of SPORTS rats to increase extracellular NE level. Thus, inhibition of oxidase activity in normal Wistar rats markedly increased wheel-running activity. These results indicate that decreased MAOA activity, elevation of extracellular NE, and alpha 2-adrenergic receptors in the hippocampus determine the neural basis of the psychological regulation of exercise behavior in SPORTS rats.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据