4.5 Article

Association of hyperadiponectinemia with severity of ventricular dysfunction in congestive heart failure

期刊

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
卷 70, 期 12, 页码 1557-1562

出版社

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOC
DOI: 10.1253/circj.70.1557

关键词

adiponectin; brain natriuretic peptide; congestive heart failure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Adiponectin, which is a collagen-like plasma protein produced by adipose tissue, has anti-atherogenic and anti-inflammatory effects. Plasma adiponectin levels in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) were determined, as well as relationships between the plasma levels of adiponectin and other hormones. Methods and Results The study group comprised 90 patients with CHF and 20 control subjects, who were,divided into 4 subgroups according to New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class. Plasma levels of adiponectin, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and cardiac hemodynamics were determined. Plasma adiponectin levels were significantly increased according to the severity of NYHA class in the patients with CHF; control: 6.2 +/- 1.0; NYHA I: 8.5 +/- 1.9, NYHA II: 12.0 +/- 2.2, NYHA III: 13.0 +/- 2.7, NYHA IV: 14.9 +/- 2.7,mu g/ml (p=0.0008). Similarly, plasma BNP levels were significantly increased in accordance with the NYHA class. Plasma adiponectin levels correlated positively with BNP (r=0.40, p=0.0002) and TNF-alpha (r=0.49, p=0.0001), and correlated negatively with cardiac index (r=-0.27, p=0.05). In 24 of 46 patients in the NYHA III and IV subgroups, according to the prompt improvement in cardiac function, levels of both plasma adiponectin and BNP were significantly reduced (p < 0.0001). Conclusion Plasma adiponectin levels increased according to the severity of CHF and, moreover, they correlated with the plasma levels of BNP and TNF-a. These results indicate that augmented release of adiponectin is involved in the pathogenesis of CHF and further study is needed to elucidate its exact role.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据