4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Antiviral activity of diverse classes of broad-acting agents and natural compounds in HHV-6-infected lymphoblasts

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY
卷 37, 期 -, 页码 S69-S75

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S1386-6532(06)70015-4

关键词

human herpesvirus 6; antiviral; CMV423; cidofovir; foscarnet

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: HHV-6 replication requires complex and poorly understood interactions between viral and cellular factors. Objectives: Several natural compounds or broad-acting pharmacological agents were studied in an attempt to discover new targets for anti-HHV-6 therapy. Study design: The antiviral activity was determined in human T-lymphoblasts, using HHV-6A (GS)-infected HSB-2 cells, HHV-6B (Z29)-infected MOLT-3 cells and HHV-6B (HST)-infected MT4 cells. Virus replication was measured by CPE and qPCR assay. Foscarnet was included as the reference compound. Results: Among the 15 natural compounds tested, only 'red marine algae' (an extract rich in sulfated polysaccharides) exhibited strong activity when added during virus adsorption. Among the broad-acting pharmacological agents, chloroquine, artemisinin, hypericin, ribavirin, resveratrol and glycyrrhizic acid were all inactive. Amantadine produced a reproducible inhibition of HHV-6 replication, albeit at relatively high concentrations. Except for lamotrigine, which was moderately active against HHV-6B, several antiepileptic drugs were shown to have no activity. We included several compounds which we previously described as potent HHV-6 inhibitors, i.e., the non-nucleoside inhibitor CMV423 and the acyclic nucleoside phosphonate analogues cidofovir and 9-(S)-[3-hydroxy-2-(phosphonomethoxy)propyl]-3-deazaadenine. The latter compound exhibited remarkable anti-HHV-6 activity. Conclusion: Further optimization of compounds belonging to diverse classes of antiherpetic agents, for their specific action against HHV-6, is warranted. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据