4.3 Article

Photoreceptor vitality in organotypic cultures of mature vertebrate retinas validated by light-dependent molecular movements

期刊

VISION RESEARCH
卷 46, 期 27, 页码 4464-4471

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.07.019

关键词

signal transduction; photoreceptors; light-dependent movements; organotypic retina culture; mouse; Xenopus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vertebrate photoreceptor cells are polarized neurons highly specialized for light absorption and visual signal transduction. Photoreceptor cells consist of the light sensitive outer segment and the biosynthetic active inner segment linked by a slender connecting cilium. The function of mature photoreceptor cells is strictly dependent on this compartmentalization which is maintained in the specialized retinal environment. To keep this fragile morphologic and functional composition for further cell biological studies and treatments we established organotypic retina cultures of mature mice and Xenopus laevis. The organotypic retina cultures of both model organisms are created as co-cultures of the retina and the pigment epithelium, still attached to outer segments of the photoreceptor cells. To demonstrate the suitability of the culture system for physiological analyses we performed apoptotic cell death analyses and verified photoreceptor viability. Furthermore, light-dependent bidirectional movements of arrestin and transducin in photoreceptors in vivo and in the retinal cultures were indistinguishable indicating normal photoreceptor cell-biologic function in organotypic cultures. Our established culture systems allow the analysis of mature photoreceptor cells and their accessibility to treatments, characteristic for common cell culture. Furthermore, this culturing technique also provides an appropriate system for gene delivery to retinal cells and will serve to simulate gene therapeutic approaches prior to difficult and time-consuming in vivo experiments. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据