4.7 Article

The radial distribution of the interstellar medium in disk galaxies: Evidence for secular evolution

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 652, 期 2, 页码 1112-1121

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/505382

关键词

dust, extinction; galaxies : individual (NGC 628, NGC 3351, NGC 3521, NGC 3627, NGC 4321, NGC 4736, NGC 4826, NGC 5055, NGC 5194, NGC 6946, NGC 7331); galaxies : ISM; galaxies : structure; infrared : galaxies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One possible way for spiral galaxies to internally evolve would be for gas to flow to the center and form stars in a central disk (pseudo-bulge). If the inflow rate is faster than the rate of star formation, a central concentration of gas will form. In this paper we present radial profiles of stellar and 8 mu m emission from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) for 11 spiral galaxies to investigate whether the interstellar medium in these galaxies contains a central concentration above that expected from the exponential disk. In general, we find that the two-dimensional CO and PAH emission morphologies are similar, and that they exhibit similar radial profiles. We find that in 6 of the 11 galaxies there is a central excess in the 8 mu m and CO emission above the inward extrapolation of an exponential disk. In particular, all four barred galaxies in the sample have strong central excesses in both 8 mu m and CO emission. These correlations suggest that the excess seen in the CO profiles is, in general, not simply due to a radial increase in the CO emissivity. In the inner disk, the ratio of the stellar to the 8 mu m radial surface brightness is similar for 9 of the 11 galaxies, suggesting a physical connection between the average stellar surface brightness and the average gas surface brightness at a given radius. We also find that the ratio of the CO to 8 mu m PAH surface brightness is consistent over the sample, implying that the 8 mu m PAH surface brightness can be used as an approximate tracer of the interstellar medium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据