4.7 Article

Biochemical characteristics and ligand-binding properties of Arabidopsis cytokinin receptor AHK3 compared to CRE1/AHK4 as revealed by a direct binding assay

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 57, 期 15, 页码 4051-4058

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erl179

关键词

AHK3; Arabidopsis thaliana; binding assay; CRE1/AHK4; cytokinin; hormone-receptor complex; receptor; sensor histidine kinase; zeatin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cytokinin receptor AHK3 of Arabidopsis thaliana plays a predominant role in shoot development. A study of the hormone-binding characteristics of AHK3 compared with the mainly root-confined receptor CRE1/AHK4 has been accomplished using a live-cell binding assay on transgenic bacteria expressing individual receptor proteins. Both receptors bound trans-zeatin (tZ) with high affinity. Scatchard analysis showed a linear function corresponding to an apparent K-D of 1-2 nM for the AHK3 receptor-hormone complex, which is close to the K-D (2-4 nM) for the CRE1/AHK4 receptor-hormone complex. The specific binding of tZ to both receptors was pH dependent, AHK3 being more sensitive to pH changes than CRE1/AHK4. Hormone binding was reversible, at least for the bulk of H-3-zeatin, and influenced by monovalent cations, while divalent cations (Ca2+, Mg2+, Mn2+) at physiological concentrations had no significant effect. AHK3 differed significantly from CRE1/AHK4 in relative affinity to some cytokinins. AHK3 had an approximately 10-fold lower affinity to isopentenyladenine (iP) and its riboside, but a higher affinity to dihydrozeatin than CRE1/AHK4. For AHK3, cytokinin ribosides (tZR, iPR) and cis-zeatin had true binding activity, although lower than that of tZ. The phenylurea-derived cytokinin thidiazuron was a strong competitor and bound to the same site as did adenine-derived cytokinins. The inhibitor of cytokinin action butan-1-ol had little effect on cytokinin-receptor complex formation. The revealed properties of AHK3 suggest its specific function in root-to-shoot communication.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据