4.7 Article

Spray cooling of enhanced surfaces: Impact of structured surface geometry and spray axis inclination

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER
卷 49, 期 25-26, 页码 4910-4920

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.05.031

关键词

enhancement; spray cooling; finned surfaces; heat transfer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experiments were conducted to study the effects of enhanced surfaces and spray inclination angle (the angle between the surface normal and the axis of symmetry of the spray) on heat transfer during spray cooling. The surface enhancements consisted of cubic pin fins, pyramids, and straight fins. These structures were machined on the top surface of heated copper blocks with 2.0 cm(2) cross-sectional areas. Measurements were also obtained on a heated flat surface to provide baseline data. PF-5060 was used as the working fluid. The spray was produced using a 2 x 2 nozzle array under nominally degassed conditions (chamber pressure of 41.4 kPa) with a volume flux of 0.016 m(3)/m(2) s and a nozzle height of 17 mm. The spray temperature was 20.5 degrees C. For the geometries tested, the straight fins had the largest heat flux enhancement relative to the flat surface, followed by the cubic pin fins and the pyramid surface. Each of these surfaces also indicated an increase in evaporation efficiency at CHF compared to the flat surface. Inclination of the spray axis between 0 degrees and 45 degrees relative to the heater surface normal created a noticeable increase in heat flux compared to the normal position (0 degrees case). A maximum heat flux enhancement of 23% was attained for the flat surface. The straight finned surface had a maximum heat flux enhancement of 75% at an inclination angle of 30 degrees relative to the flat surface in the normal position. However, only a marginal increase (similar to 11%) was observed in comparison to the straight finned surface in the normal position (0 degrees case). (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据