4.5 Article

Effect of spinal cord stimulation in an animal model of neuropathic pain relates to degree of tactile allodynia

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE
卷 143, 期 2, 页码 541-546

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.08.007

关键词

neuropathic pain; tactile allodynia; spinal cord stimulation; rat; sciatic nerve lesion; von Frey

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an established treatment for chronic neuropathic pain. However, in recent studies conflicting results regarding the effect of SCS were noted in a selected group of patients suffering from complex regional pain syndrome and mechanical allodynia. In the present study we investigated the pain relieving effect of SCS in a rat experimental model of neuropathic pain as related to the severity of mechanical allodynia. Adult male rats (n=45) were submitted to a unilateral sciatic nerve ligation. The level of allodynia was tested using the withdrawal response to tactile stimuli with the von Frey test. A portion of these rats developed marked tactile hypersensitivity in the nerve-lesioned paw (von Frey test), similar to tactile allodynia observed after nerve injury in humans. Prior to SCS treatment the rats were subdivided into three groups based on the level of allodynia: mild, moderate and severe. All allodynic rats were treated with SCS (n=27) for 30 min (f=50 Hz; pulse width 0.2 ms and stimulation at 213 of motor threshold) at 16 days post-injury. Our data demonstrate a differential effect of SCS related to the severity of the mechanical allodynia. SCS leads to a faster and better pain relief in mildly allodynic rats as compared with the more severely allodynic rats. Thus, we suggest that the selection and subdivision of patient groups similar to those defined in our experimental setting (mild, moderate and severe allodynic) may provide better pre-treatment prediction of possible therapeutic benefits of SCS. (c) 2006 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据