4.7 Article

Chronic progesterone antagonist-estradiol therapy suppresses breakthrough bleeding and endometrial proliferation in a menopausal macaque model

期刊

HUMAN REPRODUCTION
卷 21, 期 12, 页码 3081-3090

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/del282

关键词

endometrium; estradiol; hormone therapy; progestin antagonist; rhesus macaque

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Clinicians routinely prescribe progestins along with estrogens during menopausal hormone therapy (HT) to block estrogen-dependent endometrial proliferation. Breakthrough bleeding (BTB) can negate the utility of this treatment. Because progestin antagonists also inhibit estrogen-dependent endometrial proliferation in women and macaques, we used a menopausal macaque model to determine whether a potent progestin antagonist (ZK 230 211, Schering AG; ZK) combined with estrogen would provide a novel mode of HT. METHOD: Ovariectomized rhesus macaques were treated for 5 months with either estradiol (E-2) alone, E-2 + progesterone (two doses) or E-2 + ZK (0.01, 0.05 or 0.25 mg/kg). RESULTS: In the E-2 + progesterone groups, progesterone suppressed endometrial proliferation and induced a thick decidualized endometrium. In the E-2 + ZK 230 211 groups, all doses of ZK blocked endometrial proliferation and induced endometrial atrophy. In all ZK-treated groups, the atrophied endometrium contained some dilated glands lined by an inactive, flattened, non-mitotic epithelium. BTB was much lower in the E-2 + ZK groups (17 days of spotting, all groups) than in the E-2 and E-2 + progesterone groups (155 bleeding days, all groups). ZK suppressed E-2 effects in the cervix, but not in the vagina, oviduct or mammary glands. All serum chemistry and lipid profiles were normal. CONCLUSION: The ability of ZK to block estrogen-dependent endometrial proliferation, induce endometrial atrophy and suppress BTB in a menopausal macaque model indicates that progestin antagonists may provide a novel mode of HT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据