4.6 Article

The metabolic syndrome is associated with reduced risk of prostate cancer

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 164, 期 11, 页码 1094-1102

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwj320

关键词

diabetes mellitus; metabolic syndrome X; prospective studies; prostatic neoplasms

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R03-CA65473] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [N01-HC-55020, N01-HC-55019, N01-HC-55018, N01-HC-55016, N01-HC-55021, N01-HC-55015, N01-HC-55022] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diabetes is associated with reduced risk of prostate cancer, but whether the metabolic syndrome is associated with prostate cancer is not established. The authors assessed this association in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, comprising 6,429 men in four US communities initially with no history of cancer and aged 45-64 years. Metabolic syndrome and other risk factors were assessed in 1987-1989. Follow-up for prostate cancer incidence (n = 385 through 2000) was accomplished through cancer registry and hospital linkage. At baseline, 1,871 men (29.5%) had the metabolic syndrome. After the authors adjusted for other risk factors, men with the metabolic syndrome (>= 3 components) were significantly less likely to develop prostate cancer (relative risk = 0.77, 95% confidence interval: 0.60, 0.98) than men without the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes was negatively associated with prostate cancer, although the confidence interval included 1 (relative risk = 0.73, 95% confidence interval: 0.51, 1.05). When diabetic participants were excluded, the inverse association between metabolic syndrome and prostate cancer incidence was slightly strengthened. In this study, the metabolic syndrome was associated with decreased prostate cancer incidence. The authors hypothesize that this finding reflects a decrease in bioavailable (free and albumin-bound) testosterone with the metabolic syndrome and a concomitant reduction in prostate cancer risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据