4.4 Article

Dual role of MyD88 in rapid clearance of relapsing fever Borrelia spp.

期刊

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
卷 74, 期 12, 页码 6750-6760

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01160-06

关键词

-

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCI NIH HHS [5P30 CA 42014, P30 CA042014] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIAID NIH HHS [AI 43521, R01 AI043521, R29 AI043521, AI 24158, R56 AI032223, R01 AI032223, R01 AI024158, AI 32223] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM 07464, T32 GM007464] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Relapsing fever Borrelia spp. undergo antigenic variation, achieve high levels in blood, and require rapid production of immunoglobulin M (IgM) for clearance. MyD88-deficient mice display defective clearance of many pathogens; however, the IgM response to persistent infection is essentially normal. Therefore, MyD88(-/-) mice provided a unique opportunity to study the effect of nonantibody, innate host defenses to relapsing fever Borrelia. Infected MyD88(-/-) mice harbored extremely high levels of B. hermsii in the blood compared to wild-type littermates. In the comparison of MyD88(-/-) mice and B- and T-cell-deficient scid mice, two features stood out: (i) bacterial numbers in blood were at least 10-fold greater in MyD88-/- mice than scid mice, even though the production of IgM still occurred in MyD88-/- mice; and (ii) many of the MyD88-/- mice were able to exert partial clearance, although with delayed kinetics relative to wild-type mice, a feature not seen in scid mice. Further analysis revealed a delay in the IgM response to lipoproteins expressed by the original inoculum; however, by 6 days of infection antibodies were produced in MyD88-/- mice that could clear spirochetemia in scid mice. While these results indicated that the production of IgM was delayed in MyD88-/- mice, they also point to a second, antibody-independent role for MYD88 signaling in host defense to relapsing fever Borrelia. This second defect was apparent only when antibody levels were limiting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据