4.7 Article

Formation, characterization and partial purification of a Tn5 strand transfer complex

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 364, 期 3, 页码 290-301

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.09.038

关键词

Tn5; DNA transposition; strand transfer reaction; transposase; transpososome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DNA transposition reactions typically involve a strand transfer step wherein the transposon ends are covalently joined by the transposase protein to a short target site. There is very little known about the transposase-DNA interactions that direct this process, and thus our overall understanding of the dynamics of DNA transposition reactions is limited. Tn5 presents an attractive system for defining such interactions because it has been possible to solve the structure of at least one Tn5 transposition intermediate: a transpososome formed with pre-cleaved ends. However, insertion specificity in the Tn5 system is low and this has hampered progress in generating target-containing transpososomes that are homogeneous in structure (i.e. where a single target site is engaged) and therefore suitable for biochemical and structural analysis. We have developed a system where the Tn5 transpososome integrates almost exclusively into a single target site within a short DNA fragment. The key to establishing this high degree of insertion specificity was to use a target DNA with tandem repeats of a previously characterized Tn5 insertion hotspot. The target DNA requirements to form this strand transfer complex are evaluated. In addition, we show that target DNAs missing single phosphate groups at specific positions are better substrates for strand transfer complex formation relative to the corresponding unmodified DNA fragments. Moreover, utilization of missing phosphate substrates can increase the degree of target site selecticin. A method for concentrating and partially purifying the Tn5 strand transfer complex is described. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据