4.4 Article

Mechanical properties determined by nanoindentation tests of [Pb(ZrTi)O3] and [Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)1-xTixO3] sputtered thin films

期刊

THIN SOLID FILMS
卷 515, 期 4, 页码 1385-1393

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2006.03.062

关键词

nanoindentation; thin films; PZT; PMNT; indentation modulus; hardness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As the introduction of piezoelectric materials into micro electromechanical systems increases, there is a correlating requirement for understanding the mechanical properties of these films. We have investigated the mechanical properties of unpoled PZT [Pb(Zr,Ti)O-3] and PMNT [Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)(1-x)TixO3] thin films deposited by sputtering. In this study, nano-indentation, a technique which allows determination of the transverse mechanical properties, is used. It is the easiest method for assessing the biaxial elastic modulus and the hardness of thin films. It was confirmed that neither cracks, nor pile-ups, were observed for indentation depths below 20% of the film's thickness. The continuous stiffness method was used and allowed us to demonstrate that the indentation modulus decreases continuously with increasing grain diameter. This can be explained by the orientation changes of the crystallites with increasing grain diameter. The indentation modulus measured under load, or at almost null load (that is when the ferroelectric domains are or are not oriented by the stress) are coherent with those determined by the same method with a hard bulk ceramic. These results tend to show that the compliance C-ij of the hard bulk ceramic can possibly be used with sputtered thin films. The hardness is almost independent of the grain diameter (Hb congruent to 7.5 +/- 0.9 GPa) and higher than that for the bulk PZT ceramics considered in this study. PMNT and PZT films have appreciably the same mechanical characteristics. No influence of the film thickness was found on the values of both of these parameters. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据