4.6 Article

The luminal domain participates in the endosomal trafficking of the cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
卷 312, 期 20, 页码 4090-4107

出版社

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.09.024

关键词

IGF2/M6P receptor; extracellular domain; TGN-endosome transport; live-cell imaging; FRAP experiment; I-cell disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although the role of the cytoplasmic tail of the cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor (CIMPR) has been well established in the receptor trafficking, that of the luminal domain is still controversial. We noticed that the peripheral distribution of GFP, fused to the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of CIMPR (G-CIMPR-tail), was distinct from that of endogenous CIMPR or of GFP fused to the full-length CIMPR (G-CIMPR-full). By live-cell imaging, trans-Golgi-network (TGN)-derived transport carriers containing G-CIMPR-full more frequently stopped and overlapped with transferrin-containing endosomes in the peripheral region than those containing G-CIMPR-tail. G-CIMPR-full was recycled back to the perinuclear TGN more slowly than that for G-CIMPR-tail, evidenced by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching analysis. Moreover, endogenous CIMPR and G-CIMPR-full, but not GFP-CIMPR-tail, drastically altered the characteristic distribution after treatment with chloroquine. A mutant receptor, G-CIMPR-full R/A, that cannot recognize the mannose 6-phosphate (M6P)-signal, behaved similarly to G-CIMPR-full, indicating that these differences are not attributable to the M6P-ligands binding situation. Interestingly, we also found that U18666A treatment was able to discriminate the M6P-ligand binding-dependent trafficking of CIMPR. Based on these findings, we propose that the CIMPR luminal domain is required for tight interaction with endocytic compartments, and retention by them, and that there are additional transport steps, in which the binding to M6P-ligands is involved. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据