4.7 Article

Relevance of the ligand exchange rate and mechanism of fac-[(CO)3M(H2O)3]+ (M = Mn, Tc, Re) complexes for new radiopharmaceuticals

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 45, 期 25, 页码 10378-10390

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ic061578y

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The water exchange process on fac-[(CO)(3)Mn(H2O)(3)](+) and fac-[(CO)(3)Tc(H2O)(3)](+) was kinetically investigated by O-17 NMR as a function of the acidity, temperature, and pressure. Up to pH 6.3 and 4.4, respectively, the exchange rate is not affected by the acidity, thus demonstrating that the contribution of the monohydroxo species fac-[(CO)(3)M(OH)(H2O)(2)] is not significant, which correlates well with a higher p K a for these complexes compared to the homologue fac-[(CO)(3)Re(H2O)(3)](+) complex. The water exchange rate k(ex)(298)/s(-1) (Delta H-ex(double dagger)/kJ mol(-1); Delta S-ex(double dagger)/J mol(-1) K-1; Delta V-double dagger/cm(3) mol(-1)) decreases down group 7 from Mn to Tc and Re: 23 (72.5; + 24.4; + 7.1) > 0.49 (78.3; + 11.7; + 3.8) > 5.4 x 10(-3) (90.3; + 14.5; -). For the Mn complex only, an O exchange on the carbonyl ligand could be measured (k(CO)(338) = 4.3 x 10(-6) s(-1)), which is several orders of magnitude slower than the water exchange. In the case of the Tc complex, the coupling between O-17 (I = 5/2) and Tc-99 (I = 9/2) nuclear spins has been observed ((1)J(99Tc,) (17O) = 80 +/- 5 Hz). The substitution of water in fac-[(CO)(3)M(H2O)(3)](+) by dimethyl sulfide (DMS) is slightly faster than that by CH3CN: 3 times faster for Mn, 1.5 times faster for Tc, and 1.2 times faster for Re. The pressure dependence behavior is different for Mn and Re. For Mn, the change in volume to reach the transition state is always clearly positive (water exchange, CH3CN, DMS), indicating an I-d mechanism. In the case of Re, an I-d/I-a changeover is assigned on the basis of reaction profiles with a strong volume maximum for pyrazine and a minimum for DMS as the entering ligand.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据