4.4 Article

Multipartite Quantum Coherence and Distribution under the Unruh Effect

期刊

ANNALEN DER PHYSIK
卷 530, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/andp.201800167

关键词

monogamy relations; quantum coherence; Unruh effect

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [11605028]
  2. Key Program of Excellent Youth Talent Project of the Education Department of Anhui Province [gxyqZD2018065, gxyqZD2016190]
  3. Open Foundation for CAS Key Laboratory of Quantum Information [KQI201702, KQI201804]
  4. Research Center for Quantum Information Technology of Fuyang Normal University [kytd201706]
  5. Key Program of Excellent Youth Talent Project of Fuyang Normal University [rcxm201804]
  6. Natural Science Research Project of Education Department of Anhui Province [KJ2018A0343, KJ2018A0334, KJ2017A342]
  7. Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation [1608085MA10]
  8. Doctoral Foundation of Fuyang Normal University [FYNU1602]
  9. Natural Science Foundation of Fuyang Normal University [2018FSKJ16]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quantum coherence of the tripartite W state and Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) state under the Unruh effect are explored based on the model of a two-level detector qubit coupled to a massless scalar field. The results reveal that Unruh thermal noise really destroys tripartite quantum resources. It is worth mentioning that the quantum coherence of the GHZ state reaches zero in the infinite acceleration limit, but that of the W-state always remains nonzero. Coherence of the GHZ state displays a sudden death as the coupling parameter grows, while coherence freezing can be witnessed for the W state. It can be concluded that the W state is more robust than the GHZ state against Unruh radiation. Moreover, the related investigation can be expanded to N-qubit quantum systems and the corresponding analytical solution is obtained. It indicates that the larger number W-type entangled qubit can be as a better quantum resource for quantum information tasks under the Unruh effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据