4.6 Article

Similar transition states mediate the Q-cycle and superoxide production by the cytochrome bc1 complex

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 281, 期 50, 页码 38459-38465

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M605119200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM 20379, GM 61904] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cytochrome bc complexes found in mitochondria, chloroplasts and many bacteria play critical roles in their respective electron transport chains. The quinol oxidase (Q(o)) site in this complex oxidizes a hydroquinone ( quinol), reducing two one-electron carriers, a low potential cytochrome b heme and the Rieske iron-sulfur cluster. The overall electron transfer reactions are coupled to transmembrane translocation of protons via a Q-cycle mechanism, which generates proton motive force for ATP synthesis. Since semiquinone intermediates of quinol oxidation are generally highly reactive, one of the key questions in this field is: how does the Q(o) site oxidize quinol without the production of deleterious side reactions including superoxide production? We attempt to test three possible general models to account for this behavior: 1) The Q(o) site semiquinone ( or quinol-imidazolate complex) is unstable and thus occurs at a very low steady-state concentration, limiting O-2 reduction; 2) the Q(o) site semiquinone is highly stabilized making it unreactive toward oxygen; and 3) the Q(o) site catalyzes a quantum mechanically coupled two-electron/two-proton transfer without a semiquinone intermediate. Enthalpies of activation were found to be almost identical between the uninhibited Q-cycle and superoxide production in the presence of antimycin A in wild type. This behavior was also preserved in a series of mutants with altered driving forces for quinol oxidation. Overall, the data support models where the rate-limiting step for both Q-cycle and superoxide production is essentially identical, consistent with model 1 but requiring modifications to models 2 and 3.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据