3.8 Article

Long-term impact of early treatment on radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis

期刊

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/art.22353

关键词

rheumatoid arthritis; antirheumatic agents; disease progression; structural joint damage

资金

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [P60-AR-47782] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Although early initiation of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) is effective in controlling short-term joint damage in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the long-term benefit in disease progression is still controversial. We examined the long-term benefit of early DMARD initiation on radiographic progression in early RA. Methods. We identified published and unpublished clinical trials and observational studies from 1966 to September 2004 examining the association between delay to treatment initiation and progressive radiographic joint damage. We included studies of persons with RA disease duration < 2 years and DMARD therapy of similar efficacy during followup. The differences in annual rates of radiographic progression between early and delayed therapy were pooled as standardized mean differences (SMDs). Results. A total of 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled estimate of effects from these studies demonstrated a significant reduction of radiographic progression in patients treated early (-0.19 SMD, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] -0.34, -0.04), which corresponded to a -33% reduction (95% CI -50, -16) in long-term progression rates compared with patients treated later. Patients with more aggressive disease seemed to benefit most from early DMARD initiation (P = 0.04). Conclusion. These results support the existence of a critical period to initiate antirheumatic therapy, a therapeutic window of opportunity early in the course of RA associated with sustained benefit in radiographic progression for up to 5 years. Prompt initiation of antirheumatic therapy in persons with RA may alter the long-term course of the disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据