4.7 Article

Induction of G2/M phase arrest and apoptosis of human leukemia cells by potent antitumor triazoloacridinone C-1305

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 72, 期 12, 页码 1668-1679

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2006.07.035

关键词

triazoloacridinones; C-1305; G2/M arrest; apoptosis; caspases; mitochondria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

in this study, we show that triazoloacridinone derivative C-1305, a potent antitumor compound, in human lymphoblastic (MOLT4) and promyelocytic (HL60) leukemia cells induces G2/M arrest followed by apoptosis. In both type of cells, C-130S at biological relevant concentrations corresponding to EC90 value, induced a significant increase in the fraction of G2/M cells. The cell cycle perturbations were accompanied by the appearance of sub-G1 fraction, which can be considered as the apoptotic cells population. In both human leukemia cells apoptosis was additionally proved by appearance of DNA fragmentation, activation of caspase-3, PARP cleavage, externalization of phosphatydilserine as well as decrease of the mitochondrial transmembrane potential Delta psi(m) and ATP depletion. Treatment of lymphoblastic MOLT4 cells with the C-1305 at EC90 concentration, caused massive death by apoptosis. Compared to MOLT4 cells, the capacity of HL60 cells to execute apoptosis after C-1305 treatment at equitoxic dose was significantly weaker, but very effective at high concentration (4x EC90). These differences could originate from different sensitivity of both cell types to cytotoxic action of C-1305 (EC50 value for MOLT4 cells was 8 times lower than for HL60 cells and the EC90 value was 14 times lower, respectively). Collectively, these results show that C-1305 is a novel and potent compound which induces G2/M arrest and subsequent apoptosis of human leukemia cells. This strong ability to induce apoptosis of tumor cells support the view that C-1305 could be consider as a new potent and promising antitumor agent. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据