4.5 Article

Localization of agonist-sensitive PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 reveals a nuclear pool that is insensitive to PTEN expression

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 119, 期 24, 页码 5160-5168

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.000133

关键词

phosphoinositide 3-kinase; phosphatidylinositol trisphosphate; nucleus; phosphatase; PTEN; electron microscopy

资金

  1. MRC [G9403619] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [G9403619] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [G9403619] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5) trisphosphate [PtdIns(3,4,5)P-3] is a lipid second messenger, produced by Type I phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI 3-kinases), which mediates intracellular responses to many growth factors. Although PI 3-kinases are implicated in events at both the plasma membrane and intracellular sites, including the nucleus, direct evidence for the occurrence of PtdIns( 3,4,5) P-3 at non-plasma membrane locations is limited. We made use of the pleckstrin homology (PH) domain of general receptor for phosphoinositides (Grp1) to detect PtdIns(3,4,5) P-3 in an on-section labeling approach by quantitative immunogold electron microscopy. Swiss 3T3 cells contained low levels of PtdIns(3,4,5) P-3 that increased up to 15-fold upon stimulation with platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF). The signal was sensitive to PI 3-kinase inhibitors and present mainly at plasma membranes, including lamellipodia, and in a surprisingly large pool within the nuclear matrix. Comparatively little labeling was observed in endomembranes. A similar distribution of PtdIns(3,4,5) P-3 was observed in U87MG cells, which lack the PtdIns( 3,4,5) P-3 phosphatase, PTEN. Re-expression of PTEN into U87MG cells ablated plasma membrane PtdIns(3,4,5) P-3, but not the nuclear pool of this lipid even when PTEN was targeted to nuclei. These data have important implications for the versatility of PI 3-kinase signaling and for the proposed functions of PTEN in the nucleus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据