4.6 Article

Nuclear localization of poly(A) plus mRNA following siRNA reduction of expression of the mammalian RNA helicases UAP56 and URH49

期刊

GENE
卷 384, 期 -, 页码 37-44

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2006.07.010

关键词

mRNA processing; mRNA nuclear export; mammalian cells; gene expression

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA16058] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM48752, GM29356] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

UAP56 is a eukaryotic RNA helicase that is important for mRNA splicing and nuclear export. Although most eukaryotes have a single protein corresponding to UAP56, we have shown previously that in human and mouse cells there is a second protein, URH49, which is 90% identical to UAP56. Both proteins interact with the mRNA export factor Aly and both are able to rescue the loss of Sub2p (the yeast homolog of UAP56), suggesting that both proteins have similar functions. However, the two helicases have different expression profiles in different tissues and in growth-stimulated cells, which raises the possibility that they might be involved in the splicing and export of non-identical populations of mRNA. In the present study, we have used RNA interference to further explore the functions of these two helicases. Reducing the expression of either URH49 or UAP56 in HeLa cells had little effect on cell proliferation or expression of a co-transfected gene. However, analysis of poly(A)+ RNA localization by fluorescent in situ hybridization revealed a speckled pattern of RNA accumulation throughout the nucleus. Reducing the expression of both helicases resulted in a major reduction in reporter gene expression as well as cell death within 72 h. We also observed a more prominent speckled pattern of nuclear poly(A)+ RNA accumulation as well as reduced accumulation in the cytoplasmic compartment. These observations suggest that both helicases have essential but largely overlapping functions in the processing and export of mammalian mRNAs. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据