4.5 Article

Synthesis and evaluation of injectable, in situ crosslinkable synthetic extracellular matrices for tissue engineering

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30831

关键词

glycosaminoglycan; covalent crosslinker; regenerative medicine; 3D cell culture; hydrogel; hyaluronan; chondroitin sulfate

资金

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [1R01 DC04663, 2R01 DC04663] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Simple and effective biocompatible materials that mimic the natural extracellular matrix (ECM) were developed for a variety of uses in regenerative medicine. These synthetic ECMs (sECMs) were designed to recapitulate the minimal composition required to obtain functional ECMs. The sECM components are crosslinkable in situ, and may be seeded with cells prior to injection in vivo, without compromising either the cells or the recipient tissues. Several sECM compositions were evaluated to establish which formulation would be most beneficial for cell growth and tissue remodeling. Three natural ECM macromonomeric building blocks were employed: hyaluronan (HA), chondroitin sulfate (CS), and gelatin (Gtn). The carboxyl-rich glycosaminoglycans and Gtn were each chemically modified to give the corresponding thiolated dithiopropionyhydrazide (DTPH) derivatives (CS-DTPH, H-ADTPH, and Gtn-DTPH). Different compositions of CS-Gtn and HA-Gtn hydrogels were fabricated by crosslinking the crylate. Each sECM had high water content (> 96%), biologically suitable mechanical properties, and a useful gelation time (similar to 2-6 min). The bioerosion rates for the sECMs were determined, and a given composition could be selected to meet the requirements of a given clinical application. Both the HA-Gtn and CS-Gtn sECM. hydrogels supported cell growth and proliferation with cultured murine fibroblasts in vitro. Moreover, subcutaneous injection of a suspension of murine fibroblasts in each of the two sECM hydrogels into nude mice in vivo resulted in the formation of viable and uniform soft tissue in vivo. (c) 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据