4.7 Article

Curie temperatures of synthetic titanomagnetites in the Fe-Ti-O system: Effects of composition, crystal chemistry, and thermomagnetic methods

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2006JB004591

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study is aimed at improving the calibration of the compositional dependence of the Curie temperature (T-C) of titanomagnetite (Tmt) on the basis of temperature-dependent magnetic susceptibility (chi-T) curves measured on synthetic Tmts in the Fe-Ti-O system. In order to assess the possible influence of high-temperature cation vacancies onto the T-C values, we have synthesized two types of assemblages in subsolidus conditions at 1 bar, 1100 degrees C and 1300 degrees C, under controlled oxygen fugacity conditions. Tmts synthesized in equilibrium with ilmenite-hematite(ss) (Ilm(ss)) are expected to have the highest vacancy concentrations, those in equilibrium with wustite (Wus) the lowest. The composition and homogeneity of the synthetic Tmts were carefully checked with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and an electron microprobe (EMP). T-C was determined from chi-T curves using a kappabridge and, for comparison, from M-s-T curves measured with a variable field translation balance. Our data set shows systematically higher T-C values for Tmt coexisting with Ilm(ss) than for Tmt coexisting with Wus. Most chi-T curves are nonreversible, whereby the largest Delta T-C (40 K) concern Tmt(+Ilm(ss)) of intermediate compositions synthesized at 1300 degrees C. Nonreversibility is interpreted as reflecting cation reordering in Tmt during the high-temperature chi-T measurements. T-C values obtained from M-s-T curves are higher than those obtained from the chi-T curves, whereby the difference regularly increases (up to 40 K) with increasing Ti content, up to X-Usp = 0.6. Our new calibration curves are suitable to retrieve Tmt compositions in basalts that were rapidly cooled and not oxidized by deuteric or hydrothermal fluids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据