4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

CrAlYN/CrN superlattice coatings deposited by the combined high power impulse magnetron sputtering/unbalanced magnetron sputtering technique

期刊

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
卷 201, 期 7, 页码 4105-4110

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.08.027

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CrAlYN/CrN coatings represent a new generation Ti-free PVD coatings tailored to serve high temperature applications such as dry high speed machining and protection of special grades aerospace and automotive alloys against environmental attack. The novel High Power Impulse Magnetron Sputtering (HIPIMS) technique was used for substrate pre-treatment (etching) followed by coating deposition utilising Unbalanced Magnetron Sputtering (UBM). The employment of HIPIMS resulted in smooth (R-a = 0.036 mu m) and well adherent films with typical scratch adhesion critical load values on M2 high speed steel of L-C = 65 N. Low-angle XRD analysis showed that the coating has a nanoscale multilayer (superlattice) structure with a typical bi-layer thickness of 4 nm. XTEM observations confirmed this result and further revealed the dense, growth defect free structure of the coating due to the HIPIMS etching. CrAlYN/CrN combines high hardness of HK0.025 = 3320 with a low coefficient of friction of 0.5 and an exceptionally low sliding wear coefficient of 3.7 x 10(-17) m(3) N-1 m(-2), which is comparable to that of TiAlN/VN and Me-Carbon films. In dry high speed milling (V-cutting = 385 m min(-1)) of hardened A2 tool steel (HRC = 58), 8 min cemented carbide ball nosed end mills coated with CrAlYN/CrN outperformed TiAlCrYN, which is one of the market leading coatings dedicated to this application. When the test is carried out at the higher end of the cutting speed range of 500 m min(-1) this difference in performance becomes even more pronounced (factor of 8 longer life time), which demonstrates the excellent quality of CrAlYN/CrN. ((c))2006 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据