4.4 Article

Role of arginine-163 and the 163REEK166 motif in the oligomerization of truncated αA-crystallins

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 45, 期 51, 页码 15684-15691

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi060705z

关键词

-

资金

  1. NEI NIH HHS [EY11352] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To gain insight into the mechanism by which Arg-163 influences oligomerization of alpha A-crystallin, we prepared a series of truncated alpha A-crystallins with or without mutation of the Arg-163 residue. Expression of the proteins was achieved in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) pLysS cells, and alpha A-crystallin was purified by size-exclusion chromatography. Molecular mass was determined by molecular sieve HPLC, chaperone activity was assayed with alcohol dehydrogenase as the target protein, and structural changes were ascertained by circular dichroism (CD) measurements. With an increasing number of residues deleted, there was about a 3% decrease in oligomeric size per residue, until 10 residues were deleted. When 11 residues, including Arg-163, were deleted, the oligomeric size decreased 85%. Mutation of Arg-163 to Gly (R163G) did not affect the molecular mass in the full-length alpha A-crystallin. However, R163G mutants of all the truncated alpha A-crystallins showed a decrease in oligomeric size, those lacking 8, 9, and 10 residues showing 60-80% decrease and those lacking 5, 6, and 7 residues showing only a 7-14% decrease as compared to the corresponding truncated alpha A-crystallin. These data suggest that R163, E164, E165, and K166 in the REEK motif are also relevant to alpha A-crystallin oligomerization. The molecular masses of alpha A(1-163) and alpha A(1-163) (R163K) were nearly the same, which suggests that the role of Arg-163 is to provide a positive charge for intersubunit electrostatic interactions in the C-terminal domain. In alpha A(1-162) (S162R), recovery of the molecular mass to the level in alpha A(1-163) has not occurred; this shows that the actual position of R163 is important.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据