4.8 Article

Coupling molecular beacons to barcoded metal nanowires for multiplexed, sealed chamber DNA bioassays

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 128, 期 51, 页码 16892-16903

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja0658261

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIBIB NIH HHS [R01 EB 000268, R01 EB000268-06, R01 EB000268] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have combined molecular beacon (MB) probes with barcoded metal nanowires to enable no-wash, sealed chamber, multiplexed detection of nucleic acids. Probe design and experimental parameters important in nanowire-based MB assays are discussed. Loop regions of 24 bases and 5 base pair stem regions in the beacon probes gave optimal performance. Our results suggest that thermodynamic predictions for secondary structure stability of solution-phase MB can guide probe design for nanowire-based assays. Dengue virus-specific probes with predicted solution-phase Delta G of folding in 500 mM buffered NaCl of approximately -4 kcal/mol performed better than those with Delta G > -2 or < -6 kcal/mol. Buffered 300-500 mM NaCl was selected after comparison of several buffers previously reported for similar types of assays, and 200-500 mM NaCl was found to be the optimal ionic strength for the hybridization temperatures (25 and 50 degrees C) and probe designs used here. Target binding to the surface as a function of solution concentration fit a Sips isotherm with K-d = 1.7 +/- 0.3 nM. The detection limit was similar to 100 pM, limited by incomplete quenching. Single base mismatches could be discriminated from fully complementary targets. Oligonucleotide target sequences specific for human immunodeficiency, hepatitis C, and severe acute respiratory viruses were assayed simultaneously in a no-wash, sealed chamber, multiplexed experiment in which each of three probe sequences was attached to a different pattern of encoded nanowires. Finally, we demonstrated that probe-coated nanowires retain their selectivity and sensitivity in a triplexed assay after storage for over 3 months.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据