4.6 Article

Biochemical basis of glucokinase activation and the regulation by glucokinase regulatory protein in naturally occurring mutations

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 281, 期 52, 页码 40201-40207

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M607987200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glucokinase (GK) has several known polymorphic activating mutations that increase the enzyme activity by enhancing glucose binding affinity and/or by alleviating the inhibition of glucokinase regulatory protein (GKRP), a key regulator of GK activity in the liver. Kinetic studies were undertaken to better understand the effect of these mutations on the enzyme mechanism of GK activation and GKRP regulation and to relate the enzyme properties to the associated clinical phenotype of hypoglycemia. Similar to wild type GK, the transient kinetics of glucose binding for activating mutations follows a general two-step mechanism, the formation of an enzyme-glucose complex followed by an enzyme conformational change. However, the kinetics for each step differed from wild type GK and could be grouped into specific types of kinetic changes. Mutations T65I, Y214C, and A456V accelerate glucose binding to the apoenzyme form, whereas W99R, Y214C, and V455M facilitate enzyme isomerization to the active form. Mutations that significantly enhance the glucose binding to the apoenzyme also disrupt the protein-protein interaction with GKRP to a large extent, suggesting these mutations may adopt a more compact conformation in the apoenzyme favorable for glucose binding. Y214C is the most active mutation (11-fold increase in k(cat)/K-0.5(h)) and exhibits the most severe clinical effects of hypoglycemia. In contrast, moderate activating mutation A456V nearly abolishes the GKRP inhibition (76-fold increase in K-i) but causes only mild hypoglycemia. This suggests that the alteration in GK enzyme activity may have a more profound biological impact than the alleviation of GKRP inhibition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据