4.5 Article

A vaccine for hypertension based on virus-like particles:: preclinical efficacy and phase I safety and immunogenicity

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 63-72

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32800ff5d6

关键词

angiotensin; antibodies; blood pressure; hypertension; immune system

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Despite the availability of efficacious drugs, the success of treating hypertension is limited by patients, inconsistent drug intake. Immunization against angiotensin II may offer a valuable alternative to conventional drugs for the treatment of hypertension, because vaccines induce relatively long-lasting effects and do riot require daily dosing. Here we describe the preclinical development and the phase I clinical trial testing of a viruis-like particle (VLP)based anti hypertensive vaccine. Methods and results An angiotensin II-derived peptide was conjugated to the VLP Q beta (AngQb). AngQb was highly immunogenic in mice and rats. To test for efficacy, spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) were immunized with 400 mu g AngQb or VLP alone. Group mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) was reduced by up to 21 mmHg (159 +/- 2 versus 180 +/- 5 mmHg, P < 0.001), and total angiotensin II levels (antibody-bound and free) were, increased ninefold (85 +/- 20 versus 9 +/- 1 pmol/l, P = 0.002) compared with VLP controls. SHR treated with the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor ramipril (1 mg/kg per day by mouth) reached an SBP of 155 +/- 2 mmHg. Twelve healthy volunteers of a placebo-controlled randomized phase I trial were injected once with 100 mu g AngQb. Angiotensin II-specific antibodies were raised in all subjects (100% responder rate) and AngQb was well tolerated. Conclusions AngQb reduces blood pressure in SHR to levels obtained with an ACE inhibitor, and is immunogenic and well tolerated in humans. Therefore, vaccination against angiotensin II has the potential to become a useful anti hypertensive treatment providing long-lasting effects and improving patient compliance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据