4.3 Review

Hypoxic-ischemic injury in the immature brain -: Key vascular and cellular players

期刊

NEONATOLOGY
卷 92, 期 4, 页码 227-235

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000103741

关键词

brain damage; perinatal hypoxic; ischemic injury; immature brain; blood vessels; blood-brain barrier; astrocytes; oligodendrocytes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Over the past decade, much has been learned about the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying hypoxicischemic ( H-I) injury in the preterm human brain. The pathogenesis of H-I brain injury is now understood to be multifactorial and quite complex, depending on ( i) the severity, intensity and timing of asphyxia, ( ii) selective ischemic vulnerability, ( iii) the degree of maturity of the brain, and ( iv) the characteristics of the ensuing reoxygenation/reperfusion phase. Each of these factors has differential effects on the distinct cell populations in the brain, with certain specific cell types being particularly vulnerable in the developing brain. In this review, we discuss the role of the blood vessels and the distinct cell populations, which are the mayor constitutive elements of the immature brain, in the pathophysiology of H-I lesion. The presence of fragile and poorly anastomosed blood vessels and the existence of disturbances in the blood-brain barrier alter blood flow, vascular tone and nutrient delivery. Brain cells are sensitive to the overstimulation of neurotransmitter receptors, particularly glutamate receptors, which can provoke excitotoxicity leading to the death of neurons and other cells such as astrocytes and oligodendrocyte progenitors. Microglial activation by means of excitatory amino acids and by leukocyte migration initiates the inflammatory response giving rise to an increase in regional cerebral blood flow and promoting astrocyte and oligodendrocyte injuries. A better understanding of these aspects of H-I injury will contribute to more efficient strategies for the management of the associated damage. Copyright (C) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据