4.6 Article

Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition sensitizes renal cell carcinoma cells to the cytotoxic effects of bortezomib

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 61-69

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0255

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In renal cell carcinoma (RCC) models, maximal cytotoxicity of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib is dependent on efficient blockade of constitutive nuclear factor KB (NF-KB) activity. Signaling through the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been shown to result in NF-KB activation. Thus, we sought to investigate whether inhibition of the EGFR sensitizes RCC cells to the cytotoxic effects of bortezomib. We first established that constitutive NF-KB activity is dependent on signaling through the EGFR in RCC cells. Indeed, blockade of EGFR signaling with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resulted in inhibition of NF-KB activity. Using pharmacologic and genetic approaches, we also showed that EGFR-mediated NF-KB activation occurs through the phosphotidylinositol-3-OH kinase/AKT pathway. Combinations of the EGFR-TKI and bortezomib resulted in synergistic cytotoxic effects when RCC cells were pretreated with the EGFR-TKI, but an antagonistic interaction was observed with bortezomib pretreatment. Evaluation of the effects of drug sequencing on inhibition of NF-KB activity revealed that EGFR-TKI pretreatment markedly augmented the NF-KB inhibitory effect of bortezomib, whereas bortezomib preexposure resulted in suboptimal NF-KB blockade and thus provides a biochemical explanation for the drug interaction results. We conclude that the constitutive NF-KB activity observed in RCC cells is mediated, at least in part, through an EGFR/phosphotidylinositol-3-OH kinase/AKT signaling cascade. Pretreatment with an EGFR-TKI sensitizes to bortezomib-mediated cytotoxicity by inhibiting constitutive NF-KB activity. The combination of bortezomib and a currently approved EGFR inhibitor warrants clinical investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据