4.4 Article

Sperm quality characteristics and fertilization capacity after cryopreservation of rooster semen in extender exposed to a magnetic field

期刊

ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE
卷 198, 期 -, 页码 37-46

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2018.08.043

关键词

Ice crystallization; Magnetic field; Lipid peroxidation

资金

  1. Tarbiat Modares University (TMU, Iran)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There has not been as much success in the effectiveness of avian semen cryopreservation as that of mammalian semen cryopreservation. This has been attributed to the unique characteristics of poultry sperm. In the area of mammalian semen, the use of magnetized extenders has enhanced the cryo-resistance of sperm in some species. The applicability of this strategy to avian semen has not yet been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects on sperm quality and fertility after magnetization of extenders and use of these extenders for cryopreservation of rooster semen. Extenders were passed between two neodymium magnets that produced different magnetic induction values (0, 2000, 4000 and 6000 G). Physicochemical properties of the extenders were assessed and then semen samples were cryopreserved in the magnetized extenders. The smallest cluster sizes and zeta potentials in the extenders were observed in the extender magnetized at 2000 gauss (G). There were greater percentages of sperm total motility, viability and mitochondrial membrane potential in semen treated with the extender magnetized at 2000 G A greater percentage of sperm with enhanced membrane functionality was observed when sperm were stored in extenders magnetized with 2000 G and 4000 G. In a field trial, there were greater percentages of fertility and hatching rates of eggs using semen treated with extenders magnetized at 2000 G and 4000 G. Cryopreservation of rooster semen with magnetized extenders at 2000-4000 G resulted in enhanced quality indices of thawed sperm as well as the fertility capacity of the cryopreserved semen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据