4.4 Article

Thiol-disulfide proteins of stallion epididymal spermatozoa

期刊

ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE
卷 145, 期 1-2, 页码 29-39

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2013.12.007

关键词

Equus caballus spermatozoa; Sperm maturation; Sulphydrylated proteins; Thiol oxidation

资金

  1. FAPERJ
  2. UENF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thiol groups of cysteine residues represent redox centers involved in multiple biological functions. It has been postulated that changes in the redox status of mammalian epididymal spermatozoa contribute to the sperm maturation process. The present work shows the thiol-disulfide protein profile of stallion epididymal spermatozoa achieved by two-dimension electrophoresis and MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometry of proteins labeled with a thiol-reactive fluorescent tag, monobromobimane. Our results have shown the formation of disulfide bonds in several sperm protein fractions during the epididymal maturation process. The majority of the oxidized thiol sperm proteins identified correspond to structural molecules of the flagellum (as the outer dense fiber-1 protein - ODF1), followed by glycolytic enzymes (as glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase spermatogenic), antioxidant protectors (as glutathione S-transferase and phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase - PHGPx). The magnitude of the thiol oxidation differs between proteins, and was more drastic in polypeptides with molecular weights of up to 33 kDa, identified as ODF1 and PHGPx. A kinase anchor protein, a voltage-dependent anion channel protein and a zona pellucida-binding protein were also found in the polypeptide samples that contained oxidized -SH groups. These proteins may be modified or controlled by the mechanisms involved in the cysteine-redox changes, corroborating the belief that a correct degree of protein oxidation is required for the stabilization of sperm structure, protection against oxidative damage, induction of progressive sperm motility and fertilization. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据