4.4 Article

Testicular disorder of sex development in four cats with a male karyotype (38,XY, SRY-positive)

期刊

ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE
卷 151, 期 1-2, 页码 42-48

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.10.001

关键词

Testicular DSD; Hypospadias; SRY; AR; SRD5A2; MAMLD1

资金

  1. Department of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poland [508.534.00.0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The molecular background of disorders of sex development (DSD) in cats is poorly recognized. In this study we present cytogenetic, molecular and histological analyses of four cats subjected for the analysis due to ambiguous external genitalia. Three cases, with rudimentary penises and an abnormal position of the urethral orifice, represented different types of hypospadias. The fourth case had a normal penis, a blind vulva and spermatogenetically active testes. Histological studies showed structures typical of testes, but spermatogenic activity was observed in two cats only. All the cats had a normal male chromosome complement (38,XY) and the Y-chromosome linked genes (SRY and ZFY) were also detected. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), with the use of the feline BAC probe harboring the SRY gene, excluded the possibility of chromosome translocation of the Y chromosome fragment carrying the SRY gene onto another chromosome. Sequencing of four candidate genes (SRY-sex determining region Y; AR-androgen receptor; SRD5A2-steroid-5-alfa reductase 2 and MAMLD1-mastermind-like domain containing (1) revealed one SNP in the SRY gene, one common polymorphism in exon 1 of the AR gene (tandem repeat of a tri-nucleotide motif-CAG), six polymorphisms (5 SNPs and 1 indel) in the SRD5A2 gene and one SNP in the MAMLD1 gene. Molecular studies of the candidate genes showed no association with the identified polymorphisms, thus molecular background of the studied DSD phenotypes remains unknown. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据