4.4 Article

The usefulness of combining traditional sperm assessments with in vitro heterospermic insemination to identify bulls of low fertility as estimated in vivo

期刊

ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE
卷 132, 期 1-2, 页码 17-28

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.04.006

关键词

Bull; Fertility; Zona pellucida; Fluorochrome-labeled spermatozoa; SNPs; Paternity; Sperm chromatin damage

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Agriculture (MiPAF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To date, no single in vitro assessment can estimate bull fertility. This research was aimed at evaluating the ability of a series of laboratory assessments to assign 50 Holstein Friesian bulls grouped as low (ER-NRR < - 1.5), medium (-0.5 < ER-NRR < +0.5) and high (ER-NRR >= +1.5) fertility based on estimated relative non-return rates (ER-NRR), to the two categories of low and medium-high fertility. Heterospermic insemination with a Piedmontese reference bull was employed to define an index of competitive binding ability (CBI) to the zona pellucida using fluorochrome-labeled sperm, and a competitive fertility index (CFI) using embryo paternal assignment by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). Furthermore, kinetic parameters, membrane integrity and sperm DNA/chromatin integrity (% DFI) were assayed. Low fertility bulls had lesser (P < 0.05) values for total motility and membrane integrity, and a greater value of % DFI as compared to medium and high fertility groups. A modest (P < 0.001) correlation was reported among ER-NRR and total motility (r = 0.30), progressive motility (r = 0.26), membrane integrity (r = 0.43) and % DFI (r = 0.26). While % DFI alone allowed the identification of 70% lowly fertile bulls, combining membrane integrity, average path velocity and CBI allowed for identification of 78% of the lowly fertile sires. Paternal assignment by SNPs resulted in 96% of successful assignments and could provide an alternative support to microsatellites for in vivo studies based on heterospermic fertilization for estimating fertility. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据